[PATCH 01/34] sunxi: clock: H6: drop usage of struct sunxi_ccm_reg
Jernej Škrabec
jernej.skrabec at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 12:56:55 CET 2025
Hi Andre!
Dne nedelja, 23. marec 2025 ob 12:35:11 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Andre Przywara napisal(a):
> U-Boot drivers often revert to using C structures for modelling hardware
> register frames. This creates some problems:
> - A "struct" is a C language construct to group several variables
> together. The details of the layout of this struct are partly subject
> to the compiler's discretion (padding and alignment).
> - The "packed" attribute would force a certain layout, but we are not
> using it.
> - The actual source of information from the data sheet is the register
> offset. Here we create an artificial struct, carefully tuning the
> layout (with a lot of reserved members) to match that offset. To help
> with correctness, we put the desired information as a *comment*,
> though this is purely for the human reader, and has no effect on the
> generated layout. This sounds all very backwards.
> - Using a struct suggests we can assign a pointer and then access the
> register content via the members. But this is not the case, instead
> every MMIO register access must go through specific accessor functions,
> to meet the ordering and access size guarantees the hardware requires.
> - We share those structs in code shared across multiple SoC families,
> though most SoCs define their own version of the struct. Members must
> match in their name, across every SoC, otherwise compilation will fail.
> We work around this with even more #ifdefs in the shared code.
> - Some SoCs have an *almost* identical layout, but differ in a few
> registers. This requires hard to maintain #ifdef's in the struct
> definition.
> - Some of the register frames are huge: the H6 CCU device defines 127
> registers. We use 15 of them. Still the whole frame would need to be
> described, which is very tedious, but for no reason.
> - Adding a new SoC often forces people to decide whether to share an
> existing struct, or to create a new copy. For some cases (say like 80%
> similarity) this works out badly either way.
>
> The Linux kernel heavily frowns upon those register structs, and instead
> uses a much simpler solution: #define REG_NAME <offset>
> This easily maps to the actual information from the data sheet, and can
> much simpler be shared across multiple SoCs, as it allows to have all
> SoC versions visible, so we can use C "if" statements instead of #ifdef's.
> Also it requires to just define the registers we need, and we can use
> alternative locations for some registers much more easily.
>
> Drop the usage of "struct sunxi_ccm_reg" in the H6 SPL clock code, by
> defining the respective register names and their offsets, then adding
> them to the base pointer.
> We cannot drop the struct definition quite yet, as it's also used in
> other drivers, still.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> ---
> .../include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h | 12 +++++
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c | 52 +++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> index 76dd33c9477..a485e00f1f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,18 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #endif
>
> +#define CCU_H6_PLL1_CFG 0x000
> +#define CCU_H6_PLL5_CFG 0x010
> +#define CCU_H6_PLL6_CFG 0x020
> +#define CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG 0x500
> +#define CCU_H6_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_CFG 0x510
> +#define CCU_H6_AHB3_CFG 0x51c
> +#define CCU_H6_APB1_CFG 0x520
> +#define CCU_H6_APB2_CFG 0x524
> +#define CCU_H6_MBUS_CFG 0x540
> +#define CCU_H6_UART_GATE_RESET 0x90c
> +#define CCU_H6_I2C_GATE_RESET 0x91c
I appreciate this work very much and thanks for doing it! However, I
have just one more request - PLL1, PLL5, PLL6 and similar names are
relics of very old Allwinner SoC drivers. IMO it would be better to follow
names from user manual. This would lower confusion what are they to
uninitiated people.
Best regards.
Jernej
> +
> struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> u32 pll1_cfg; /* 0x000 pll1 (cpux) control */
> u8 reserved_0x004[12];
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> index b424a7893ea..482d9e0c695 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_XPL_BUILD
> void clock_init_safe(void)
> {
> - struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm =
> - (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> + void *const ccm = (void *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> struct sunxi_prcm_reg *const prcm =
> (struct sunxi_prcm_reg *)SUNXI_PRCM_BASE;
>
> @@ -32,60 +31,59 @@ void clock_init_safe(void)
>
> clock_set_pll1(408000000);
>
> - writel(CCM_PLL6_DEFAULT, &ccm->pll6_cfg);
> - while (!(readl(&ccm->pll6_cfg) & CCM_PLL6_LOCK))
> + writel(CCM_PLL6_DEFAULT, ccm + CCU_H6_PLL6_CFG);
> + while (!(readl(ccm + CCU_H6_PLL6_CFG) & CCM_PLL6_LOCK))
> ;
>
> - clrsetbits_le32(&ccm->cpu_axi_cfg, CCM_CPU_AXI_APB_MASK | CCM_CPU_AXI_AXI_MASK,
> + clrsetbits_le32(ccm + CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG,
> + CCM_CPU_AXI_APB_MASK | CCM_CPU_AXI_AXI_MASK,
> CCM_CPU_AXI_DEFAULT_FACTORS);
>
> - writel(CCM_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_DEFAULT, &ccm->psi_ahb1_ahb2_cfg);
> + writel(CCM_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_DEFAULT, ccm + CCU_H6_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_CFG);
> #ifdef CCM_AHB3_DEFAULT
> - writel(CCM_AHB3_DEFAULT, &ccm->ahb3_cfg);
> + writel(CCM_AHB3_DEFAULT, ccm + CCU_H6_AHB3_CFG);
> #endif
> - writel(CCM_APB1_DEFAULT, &ccm->apb1_cfg);
> + writel(CCM_APB1_DEFAULT, ccm + CCU_H6_APB1_CFG);
>
> /*
> * The mux and factor are set, but the clock will be enabled in
> * DRAM initialization code.
> */
> - writel(MBUS_CLK_SRC_PLL6X2 | MBUS_CLK_M(3), &ccm->mbus_cfg);
> + writel(MBUS_CLK_SRC_PLL6X2 | MBUS_CLK_M(3), ccm + CCU_H6_MBUS_CFG);
> }
>
> void clock_init_uart(void)
> {
> - struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm =
> - (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> + void *const ccm = (void *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
>
> /* uart clock source is apb2 */
> writel(APB2_CLK_SRC_OSC24M|
> APB2_CLK_RATE_N_1|
> APB2_CLK_RATE_M(1),
> - &ccm->apb2_cfg);
> + ccm + CCU_H6_APB2_CFG);
>
> /* open the clock for uart */
> - setbits_le32(&ccm->uart_gate_reset,
> + setbits_le32(ccm + CCU_H6_UART_GATE_RESET,
> 1 << (CONFIG_CONS_INDEX - 1));
>
> /* deassert uart reset */
> - setbits_le32(&ccm->uart_gate_reset,
> + setbits_le32(ccm + CCU_H6_UART_GATE_RESET,
> 1 << (RESET_SHIFT + CONFIG_CONS_INDEX - 1));
> }
>
> void clock_set_pll1(unsigned int clk)
> {
> - struct sunxi_ccm_reg * const ccm =
> - (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> + void *const ccm = (void *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> u32 val;
>
> /* Do not support clocks < 288MHz as they need factor P */
> if (clk < 288000000) clk = 288000000;
>
> /* Switch to 24MHz clock while changing PLL1 */
> - val = readl(&ccm->cpu_axi_cfg);
> + val = readl(ccm + CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG);
> val &= ~CCM_CPU_AXI_MUX_MASK;
> val |= CCM_CPU_AXI_MUX_OSC24M;
> - writel(val, &ccm->cpu_axi_cfg);
> + writel(val, ccm + CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG);
>
> /* clk = 24*n/p, p is ignored if clock is >288MHz */
> val = CCM_PLL1_CTRL_EN | CCM_PLL1_LOCK_EN | CCM_PLL1_CLOCK_TIME_2;
> @@ -94,20 +92,19 @@ void clock_set_pll1(unsigned int clk)
> val |= CCM_PLL1_OUT_EN;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNXI_GEN_NCAT2))
> val |= CCM_PLL1_OUT_EN | CCM_PLL1_LDO_EN;
> - writel(val, &ccm->pll1_cfg);
> - while (!(readl(&ccm->pll1_cfg) & CCM_PLL1_LOCK)) {}
> + writel(val, ccm + CCU_H6_PLL1_CFG);
> + while (!(readl(ccm + CCU_H6_PLL1_CFG) & CCM_PLL1_LOCK)) {}
>
> /* Switch CPU to PLL1 */
> - val = readl(&ccm->cpu_axi_cfg);
> + val = readl(ccm + CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG);
> val &= ~CCM_CPU_AXI_MUX_MASK;
> val |= CCM_CPU_AXI_MUX_PLL_CPUX;
> - writel(val, &ccm->cpu_axi_cfg);
> + writel(val, ccm + CCU_H6_CPU_AXI_CFG);
> }
>
> int clock_twi_onoff(int port, int state)
> {
> - struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm =
> - (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> + void *const ccm = (void *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> struct sunxi_prcm_reg *const prcm =
> (struct sunxi_prcm_reg *)SUNXI_PRCM_BASE;
> u32 value, *ptr;
> @@ -120,7 +117,7 @@ int clock_twi_onoff(int port, int state)
> ptr = &prcm->twi_gate_reset;
> } else {
> shift = port;
> - ptr = &ccm->twi_gate_reset;
> + ptr = ccm + CCU_H6_I2C_GATE_RESET;
> }
>
> /* set the apb clock gate and reset for twi */
> @@ -136,9 +133,8 @@ int clock_twi_onoff(int port, int state)
> /* PLL_PERIPH0 clock, used by the MMC driver */
> unsigned int clock_get_pll6(void)
> {
> - struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm =
> - (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> - uint32_t rval = readl(&ccm->pll6_cfg);
> + void *const ccm = (void *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> + uint32_t rval = readl(ccm + CCU_H6_PLL6_CFG);
> int n = ((rval & CCM_PLL6_CTRL_N_MASK) >> CCM_PLL6_CTRL_N_SHIFT) + 1;
> int div2 = ((rval & CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_MASK) >>
> CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_SHIFT) + 1;
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list