[PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Use CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME in binman
Quentin Schulz
quentin.schulz at cherry.de
Tue Mar 25 10:48:44 CET 2025
Hi Michal,
On 3/19/25 2:08 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> u-boot.itb name is coming via CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME and it's
They are unrelated as far as I can tell?
Isn't CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME the name of the U-Boot FIT that
the SPL is going to load from some filesystem?
u-boot.itb in the binman nodes below is the name of the generated U-Boot
FIT on your disk.
Your disk FS != SPL FS, no?
I can get behind wanting the same name for the file on both FS, but the
issue I have is the additional CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME #ifdef
will prevent the generation of this U-Boot FIT image if the symbol isn't
defined anymore (which is possible if SPL has no support for FS (ext4,
fat, squashfs, semihosting)). U-Boot likely work just fine by trying to
load u-boot.itb from another source no? (No experience with AMD,
typically only Aarch64 for me, where u-boot.itb is usually loaded from a
specific offset in the storage medium, outside of any FS).
Basically, do we really need to NOT build U-Boot FIT if
SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME is not defined?
Cheers,
Quentin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list