[Uboot-stm32] [PATCH v3 1/7] ofnode: support panel-timings in ofnode_decode_display_timing
Raphael Gallais-Pou
raphael.gallais-pou at foss.st.com
Tue Nov 4 15:01:31 CET 2025
On 11/3/25 15:17, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 08:53:43PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 at 02:10, Raphaël Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Le Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 10:03:59AM +0100, Simon Glass a écrit :
>>>> Hi Raphael,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 14:53, Raphael Gallais-Pou
>>>> <raphael.gallais-pou at foss.st.com> wrote:
...
>>>> Please add a test for this in test/dm/ofnode.c
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> I'll gladly do that, but I haven't write and use any test in U-Boot. So
>>> it is a bit foggy how to implement it.
>> There is some info here:
>>
>> https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/develop/testing.html
>>
>>> Do we want to create a fake device-tree and test each configuration or
>>> do we want to test in the _current_ device-tree if timings are correctly
>>> set according to the index value ?
>> It looks like there is a 'display-timings' node in test.dts, with three
>> subnodes, so you should just be able to get an ofnode for that and then
>> read out one of them and check it.
> OK, but what is the utility in doing that? We don't, and aren't, going
> to have tests for every valid possible DT node, and this isn't
> introducing new library parsing functionality (the most recent patch to
> test/dm/ofnode.c was for ofnode_graph and that is important to test). We
> don't have display-timing tests to start with, so we're fine not adding
> something more here.
>
(Adding back Patrice, whom had been removed from CC.)
Got it, so nothing to do on my side.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list