[PATCH 1/2] mtd: rawnand: atmel: set pmecc data setup time
Alexander Dahl
ada at thorsis.com
Fri Nov 7 12:01:23 CET 2025
Hello Eugen,
Am Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 12:52:05PM +0200 schrieb Eugen Hristev:
> Hello Zixun, Alexander,
>
> On 11/6/25 13:12, Zixun LI wrote:
> > Setup the pmecc data setup time as 3 clock cycles for 133MHz as
> > recommended by the datasheet.
> >
> > Backported from Linux: f552a7c7 ("mtd: rawnand: atmel: set pmecc data
> > setup time")
>
> Maybe use 12 digits commit hash ? I cannot find this commit in Linux
v6.16-rc4-10-gf552a7c7e0a14 aka
f552a7c7e0a14215cb8a6fd89e60fa3932a74786 from July 2025.
>
> >
> > Fixes: a490e1b7c017c ("nand: atmel: Add pmecc driver")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zixun LI <admin at hifiphile.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/pmecc.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/pmecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/pmecc.c
> > index e500a0fe3f8671ff08195c94c3383696a7731eb3..7c4e9bd5f9967b119239adf2b39e683ea62b71fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/pmecc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/atmel/pmecc.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ struct atmel_pmecc_caps {
> > int nstrengths;
> > int el_offset;
> > bool correct_erased_chunks;
> > + bool clk_ctrl;
> > };
> >
> > struct atmel_pmecc_user_conf_cache {
> > @@ -840,6 +841,10 @@ atmel_pmecc_create(struct udevice *dev,
> >
> > pmecc->regs.timing = 0;
> >
> > + /* pmecc data setup time */
> > + if (caps->clk_ctrl)
> > + writel(PMECC_CLK_133MHZ, pmecc->regs.base + ATMEL_PMECC_CLK);
> > +
> > /* Disable all interrupts before registering the PMECC handler. */
> > writel(0xffffffff, pmecc->regs.base + ATMEL_PMECC_IDR);
> > atmel_pmecc_reset(pmecc);
> > @@ -884,6 +889,7 @@ static struct atmel_pmecc_caps at91sam9g45_caps = {
> > .strengths = atmel_pmecc_strengths,
> > .nstrengths = 5,
> > .el_offset = 0x8c,
> > + .clk_ctrl = true,
>
> This appears to be done only for sam9g45.
>
> So, Alexander, this should not impact sam9x60 .
Yes it should. According to arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
the compatible used on sam9x60 is "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc", see:
pmecc: ecc-engine at ffffe000 {
compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc";
reg = <0xffffe000 0x300>,
<0xffffe600 0x100>;
};
> I looked a bit in the Linux driver and this appears to be just as bad:
> 133 Mhz clock config hardcoded. I would expect this clock to be taken
> from a clock input and not hardcoded. But oh well, if this clock is to
> be changed in another device, it would be exposed somewhere...
I did not look into that deeply, but if it is like you said, someone
should. This sounds bad.
Greets
Alex
>
> Eugen
>
> > };
> >
> > static struct atmel_pmecc_caps sama5d4_caps = {
> >
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list