[PATCH 6/9] test: cmd/fdt: do not use fixed buffer addresses
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Nov 14 13:31:40 CET 2025
Hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 at 03:10, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> The location of memory depends on the board. Do not assume memory at fixed
> memory locations. Use memalign() instead to allocate a buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> ---
> test/cmd/fdt.c | 8 ++++++--
> test/common/print.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/cmd/fdt.c b/test/cmd/fdt.c
> index b950123b6da..4c3c6308ab4 100644
> --- a/test/cmd/fdt.c
> +++ b/test/cmd/fdt.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ FDT_TEST(fdt_test_addr_resize, UTF_CONSOLE);
> static int fdt_test_move(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> {
> char fdt[256];
> - ulong addr, newaddr = 0x10000;
> + ulong addr, newaddr;
> const int size = sizeof(fdt);
> uint32_t ts;
> void *buf;
> @@ -275,8 +275,10 @@ static int fdt_test_move(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> ts = fdt_totalsize(fdt);
>
> /* Moved target DT location */
> - buf = map_sysmem(newaddr, size);
> + buf = memalign(8, size);
> + ut_assertnonnull(buf);
> memset(buf, 0, size);
> + newaddr = map_to_sysmem(buf);
>
> /* Test moving the working FDT to a new location */
> ut_assertok(run_commandf("fdt move %08lx %08lx %x", addr, newaddr, ts));
> @@ -288,6 +290,8 @@ static int fdt_test_move(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> ut_assert_nextline("Total of %d byte(s) were the same", ts);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> + free(buf);
> +
> return 0;
> }
> FDT_TEST(fdt_test_move, UTF_CONSOLE);
> diff --git a/test/common/print.c b/test/common/print.c
> index 2ac7eeed2c1..f33476a36b4 100644
> --- a/test/common/print.c
> +++ b/test/common/print.c
> @@ -266,74 +266,70 @@ static int print_do_hex_dump(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> {
> u8 *buf;
> int i;
> + ulong addr;
>
> buf = calloc(1, BUF_SIZE);
> ut_assertnonnull(buf);
> + addr = map_to_sysmem(buf);
> for (i = 0; i < 0x11; i++)
> buf[i] = i * 0x11;
>
> /* bytes */
> print_hex_dump_bytes("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, buf, 0x12);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff ..\"3DUfw........",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 10 00 ..",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x10UL);
> + addr + 0x10UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* line length */
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 8, 1, buf, 0x12, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 ..\"3DUfw",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 88 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff ........",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x8UL);
> + addr + 0x8UL);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 10 00 ..",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x10UL);
> + addr + 0x10UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* long line */
> buf[0x41] = 0x41;
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 0x40, 1, buf, 0x42, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..\"3DUfw........................................................",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00 41 .A",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x40UL);
> + addr + 0x40UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* 16-bit */
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 0, 2, buf, 0x12, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 1100 3322 5544 7766 9988 bbaa ddcc ffee ..\"3DUfw........",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 0010 ..",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x10UL);
> + addr + 0x10UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* 32-bit */
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 0, 4, buf, 0x14, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 33221100 77665544 bbaa9988 ffeeddcc ..\"3DUfw........",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00000010 ....",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x10UL);
> + addr + 0x10UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* 64-bit */
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 8, buf, 0x18, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 7766554433221100 ffeeddccbbaa9988 ..\"3DUfw........",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 0000000000000010 ........",
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf + 0x10UL);
> + addr + 0x10UL);
> ut_assert_console_end();
>
> /* ASCII */
> @@ -345,8 +341,7 @@ static int print_do_hex_dump(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> buf[8] = 255;
> print_hex_dump("", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 0, 1, buf, 10, true);
> ut_assert_nextline("%0*lx: 00 1f 20 21 7e 7f 80 81 ff 99 .. !~.....",
> - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8,
> - (uintptr_t)buf);
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT) ? 16 : 8, addr);
> ut_assert_console_end();
> free(buf);
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
This is adding memory allocations to a test for hex dumping.
It would be better and simpler to use a fixed address and make this a
sandbox-only test. I struggle to see the value of running these sorts
of tests under QEMU?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list