[PATCH] net: dwc_eth_ops: Correct check for FDT_64BIT

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Wed Oct 1 22:30:43 CEST 2025


There is no xPL_FDT_64BIT symbol and it would furthermore not likely
make sense for there to be one. Correct this check to use
CONFIG_IS_ENABLED and not IS_ENABLED.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
---
 drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c b/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c
index 551ee0ea6a02..a098916a674b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dwc_eth_qos.c
@@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ static fdt_addr_t eqos_get_base_addr_common(struct udevice *dev, fdt_addr_t addr
 	struct eqos_priv *eqos = dev_get_priv(dev);
 
 	if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) {
-#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FDT_64BIT)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FDT_64BIT)
 		dev_err(dev, "addr=0x%llx is invalid.\n", addr);
 #else
 		dev_err(dev, "addr=0x%x is invalid.\n", addr);
-- 
2.43.0



More information about the U-Boot mailing list