[PATCH] b4-config: Improve b4 config for correct operation

[Quentin Schulz]

Hi Andrew, Tom,

On 10/1/25 11:28 AM, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
> The recent change to .b4-config resulted in some expected recipients not
> being added to the address lists. Rework the commands so that all
> expected recipients are added while maintaining the ordering from the
> first change.
> 
> Fixes: 26efc940c86 ("b4-config: configure `b4` for U-Boot")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody at linaro.org>
> ---
>   .b4-config | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/.b4-config b/.b4-config
> index 6ba10cf9b50e6acb8a789544d35a13641e6c0411..1f9ada793e652c99854e4d15241734c9b3bfc117 100644
> --- a/.b4-config
> +++ b/.b4-config
> @@ -2,6 +2,5 @@
>   # See https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/config.html
>   
>   [b4]
> -    send-series-to = u-boot at lists.denx.de
> -    send-auto-to-cmd = echo ""
> -    send-auto-cc-cmd = scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> +    send-auto-to-cmd = scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --nogit-chief-penguins --norolestats --nom
> +    send-auto-cc-cmd = scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit-fallback --nogit-chief-penguins --norolestats --nol
> 

This seems to differ with b4 defaults[1] by swapping --nom and --nol 
between to and cc recipients. Is this expected?

I've been using b4 for years in U-Boot without a .b4-config so I'm 
curious why we suddenly have a need for one and I think it'd make sense 
to document that (now as a comment in .b4-config since this patch has 
been merged already).

Cheers,
Quentin

[1] 
https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/config.html#contributor-oriented-settings