[PATCH v2 3/3] doc: seama: Reword return value section

[Quentin Schulz]

Hi Tom,

On 10/24/25 6:02 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> With the addition of general text about how the return value is handled,
> reference that while retaining the additional information about setting
> $seama_image_size
> 
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> ---
>   doc/usage/cmd/seama.rst | 7 ++-----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/usage/cmd/seama.rst b/doc/usage/cmd/seama.rst
> index 17fd559f4856..a6b00f32902e 100644
> --- a/doc/usage/cmd/seama.rst
> +++ b/doc/usage/cmd/seama.rst
> @@ -56,8 +56,5 @@ The command is available if CONFIG_CMD_SEAMA=y.
>   Return value
>   ------------
>   
> -The return value $? is set 0 (true) if the loading is succefull, and
> -is set to 1 (false) in case of error.
> -
> -The environment variable $seama_image_size is set to the size of the
> -loaded SEAMA image.
> +Along with the general rules for setting $?, the environment variable
> +$seama_image_size is set to the size of the loaded SEAMA image.

Maybe we could link to the general rules section.

Adding a cross-reference label above the text added in patch 01 and then

:ref:`the general rules for setting $? <the cross-reference link you'd add>`

should do the trick (note that we need to use a text for the reference 
because the cross-reference in Sphinx cannot guess it for anything but a 
section title, c.f. 
https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/referencing.html#role-ref).

In any case,

Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>

Thanks!
Quentin