[PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: Reformat the table

[Vlim]

Hi, Marek,

This is what I plan to do, please advise if you are ok with it.


  1.
reformat the table to follow this format.

      {
            INFO("gd25q32", 0xc84016, 0, 64 * 1024,  64,
                  SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
                  SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB)
      },


  1.
Re-arrange the order of the table based on the ID, so that I can group the part #s by product family.
  2.
I have a few more part numbers to add to the table, can I add them with this update?
  3.
Do I submit as a new patch?

 Regards,

Victor



________________________________
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 20:40
To: Vlim <vlim at gigadevice.com>; Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>; u-boot at lists.denx.de <u-boot at lists.denx.de>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>; Takahiro Kuwano <Takahiro.Kuwano at infineon.com>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus at linaro.org>; Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu <venkatesh.abbarapu at amd.com>; Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: Reformat the table

[You don't often get email from marek.vasut at mailbox.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

此为外部邮件，谨防钓鱼邮件，请注意邮件是否涉及敏感信息
This is an external email, beware of phishing emails. Please pay close attention to whether the email contains sensitive information

On 10/28/25 3:03 AM, Vlim wrote:
> Thanks, Marek,

Hello Victor,

> Can I follow this format.
> Should I change all part numbers so that they are all with the same format?

What kind of change do you have in mind ?

I think the gigadevice part numbers look very much reasonable already.

> Also, is it a good idea if I change the order of the part number so that I can group part #s by product family?

Sure, the table is not sorted exactly alphabetically. If sorting by
product family makes more sense for GD, let's do that.

[...]