[PATCH v2] boot/fit: fix misleading comment

[Julien Stephan]

When load address is specified but set to 0, we ignore it and load in
place instead. The current comment is misleading, so update it.

Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan at baylibre.com>
---
It turns out that the else is not useless. The comment associated to it,
was misleading, so update the comment instead of removing the else
branch
---
Changes in v2:
- update comment instead of removing else branch
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260324-boot-fit-fix-8-byte-alignement-for-overlays-v1-1-257b132b6bda@baylibre.com
---
 boot/image-fit.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/boot/image-fit.c b/boot/image-fit.c
index 067ad236081..2d2709aa5b1 100644
--- a/boot/image-fit.c
+++ b/boot/image-fit.c
@@ -2282,7 +2282,7 @@ int fit_image_load(struct bootm_headers *images, ulong addr,
 		printf("   Loading %s from 0x%08lx to 0x%08lx\n",
 		       prop_name, data, load);
 	} else {
-		load = data;	/* No load address specified */
+		load = data;	/* load address specified but set to 0 */
 	}
 
 	comp = IH_COMP_NONE;

---
base-commit: f0000b4a57e9edf8ff8454b9056d767466dff57f
change-id: 20260324-boot-fit-fix-8-byte-alignement-for-overlays-381b0a17bf4e

Best regards,
-- 
Julien Stephan <jstephan at baylibre.com>