[PATCH 1/1] fdt: fix condition for devicetree from bloblist

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Tue Jun 2 15:25:51 CEST 2026


On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 08:36:20AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Am Montag, 1. Juni 2026, 18:15:13 CEST schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > 
> > > On boards without TPL, but SPL enabled, xpl_prev_phase() will return never
> > > return PHASE_TPL. This the condition is always true. This is a problem
> > > for system which use an SDRAM bloblist location and initialize the SDRAM
> > > in SPL. Adjust the condition to take this config into account.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>
> > > ---
> > > There is also another possibility for the check. I'm not sure which one
> > > is better or preferred.
> > > 
> > > --- a/lib/fdtdec.c
> > > +++ b/lib/fdtdec.c
> > > @@ -1829,7 +1829,7 @@ int fdtdec_setup(void)
> > >          * not whether this phase creates one.
> > >          */
> > >         if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLOBLIST) &&
> > > -           (xpl_prev_phase() != PHASE_TPL ||
> > > +           (xpl_prev_phase() != PHASE_TPL &&
> > >              IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TPL_BLOBLIST))) {
> > >                 ret = bloblist_maybe_init();
> > >                 if (!ret) {
> > > 
> > >  lib/fdtdec.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/fdtdec.c b/lib/fdtdec.c
> > > index c67b6e8c133..3f31f9c2aeb 100644
> > > --- a/lib/fdtdec.c
> > > +++ b/lib/fdtdec.c
> > > @@ -1829,8 +1829,8 @@ int fdtdec_setup(void)
> > >  	 * not whether this phase creates one.
> > >  	 */
> > >  	if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLOBLIST) &&
> > > -	    (xpl_prev_phase() != PHASE_TPL ||
> > > -	     IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TPL_BLOBLIST))) {
> > > +	    !xpl_is_first_phase() &&
> > > +	    (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TPL_BLOBLIST) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_BLOBLIST))) {
> > >  		ret = bloblist_maybe_init();
> > >  		if (!ret) {
> > >  			gd->fdt_blob = bloblist_find(BLOBLISTT_CONTROL_FDT, 0);
> > 
> > Can you please test the series at
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20260519162225.770071-1-trini@konsulko.com/
> > and see if your problem is fixed there too? Thanks.
> 
> Indeed. This fixes my problem as well.
> 
> Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>

Thanks, can you please reply to that series (the cover letter is fine)
too?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20260602/6f925544/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list