[PATCH RFC v2 4/4] all: Fix lists.denx.de links to lists.u-boot-project.org

[Neil Armstrong]

On 6/23/26 16:12, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> On 6/23/26 3:22 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> The U-Boot Mailing-list is moving to the lists.u-boot-project.org
>> domain, so fix all the links in comments still referencing the
>> list.denx.de domain to the new domain.
>>
>> The URLs were manually updated since the mailman links don't
>> match anymore after the archive import in the new mailman instance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/config.mk           | 2 +-
>>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/README | 2 +-
>>   lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest.c  | 2 +-
>>   tools/rkcommon.c                 | 4 ++--
>>   4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/config.mk b/arch/powerpc/config.mk
>> index 6e30df6504e..26fcdc4e884 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/config.mk
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/config.mk
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ archprepare: checkgcc4
>>   # GCC 3.x is reported to have problems generating the type of relocation
>>   # that U-Boot wants.
>> -# See http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/135156.html
>> +# See http://lists.u-boot-project.org/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/135156.html
> 
> Sorry for the mangled URLs, it's changed company-wide at the server-level so nothing I can do about it. We went from "please don't click on any suspicious link because security" to "click on this very long and incomprehensible link wink wink", I'll never understand.....
> 
> In any case, wrong link. You want: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/1348500648.2514.2.camel@petert/ or https://lists.u-boot-project.org/pipermail/u-boot/2012-September/134737.html if you want to stay on our archives.

I think we should move the links of the mailman archive since they can possibly change if we re-import or migrate
to a new mailing list server.

So my best would be to switch to https://patch.msgid.link/ with the message-ids, I'll try to cook that but since
the mailman interface doesn't provide the message-id it takes some time...

Neil

> 
> Cheers,
> Quentin