[PATCH] usb: Correct dependencies around USB_EMUL
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Sat Mar 21 02:24:04 CET 2026
On 3/20/26 9:53 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> The symbol USB_EMUL is how sandbox has access to USB. It's
> implementation however enforces a few other requirements. It must have
> SCSI enabled, and in turn that means it must have BLK enabled. Finally,
> we should not be using SANDBOX itself as a symbol to decide what to
> build or not build here, as SANDBOX is selected for COMPILE_TEST builds
> as well and so may not have enabled the sandbox specific USB support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/emul/Kconfig | 2 ++
> drivers/usb/host/Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/emul/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/emul/Kconfig
> index 279f6c6d7404..8ba372453e37 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/emul/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/usb/emul/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> config USB_EMUL
> bool "Support for USB device emulation"
> depends on SANDBOX
> + select BLK
The select SCSI and Makefile change I do understand. But why do we also
need BLK ? I can't find anything which would interact with BLK in the
sandbox USB emulation ?
> select DM_USB
> + select SCSI
> select USB_HOST
> help
> Since sandbox does not have access to a real USB bus, it is possible
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
> index ef4ce62a680c..9cac53f07c7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/Makefile
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>
> ifdef CONFIG_$(PHASE_)DM_USB
> obj-y += usb-uclass.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SANDBOX) += usb-sandbox.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_USB_EMUL) += usb-sandbox.o
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_$(PHASE_)USB_STORAGE
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list