[PATCH] s5p4418_nanopi2: Drop unnecessary BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F usage
Stefan Bosch
stefan_b at posteo.net
Tue Mar 31 19:40:01 CEST 2026
Hi Tom,
thank you for the patch. You are right, board_early_init_f can be
removed. But where is CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F enabled, I didn't found
it. Have I missed something?
Regards
Stefan
On 25.03.26 20:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> This platform enables CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F and then has a
> do-nothing board_early_init_f function. Change to not enabling the
> option and so not needing an empty function. >
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> Cc: Stefan Bosch <stefan_b at posteo.net>
> ---
> board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c b/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
> index 4dff32e10d6b..ca8ae529ddf4 100644
> --- a/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
> +++ b/board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c
> @@ -406,11 +406,6 @@ __exit:
> * call from u-boot
> */
>
> -int board_early_init_f(void)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> int board_init(void)
> {
> bd_hwrev_init();
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list