[U-Boot-Users] RE: Nand OOB layout, u-boot and the kernel sources do not agree.. ??

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <00512BA4F9D3D311912A009027E9B8F407E524 at NT> you wrote:
>
> Position 5 is where the chip makers mark bad sectors, so we do not
> get a choice. The NAND_NOOB values in U-BOOT are wrong and should
> be changed to match the new ones in the Linux kernel. I think the
> original cmd_nand.c was based on a very old version of MTD.

Probably. Can anybody please submit a patch, then?


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
This all sounds complicated, but it mostly does excatly what you  ex-
pect. It's just difficult for us to explain what you expect...
                       - L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_