[U-Boot-Users] waiting for timeouts in FPGA code?

[Steven Scholz]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:

>>Is CFG_HZ defined for all other architectures?
> It is supposed to be defined. But many boards define it incorrectly.

>>Should we use CFG_HZ instead of hardcoded numbers?
> Definitely.

Here we go:

* Patch by Steven Scholz, 25 Feb 2004:
   - Timeouts in FPGA code should be based on CFG_HZ
   - Minor cleanup in code for Altera FPGA ACEX1K

BTW: I just noticed that loads of timeouts (e.g. CFG_FLASH_ERASE_TOUT) 
are _not_ defined using CFG_HZ ...

-- 
Steven Scholz

imc Measurement & Control               imc Meßsysteme GmbH
Voltastr. 5                             Voltastr. 5
13355 Berlin                            13355 Berlin
Germany                                 Deutschland
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fpga-CFG_HZ.patch
Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20040225/f24e0a1b/attachment.txt