[U-Boot-Users] bootm change for standalone images
wd at denx.de
Thu Jul 29 19:29:14 CEST 2004
In message <1091121391.19389.33.camel at mud> you wrote:
> Well I may just do (1), but I wanted to make it easier for the next poor
> soul that had the same issue. It is not obvious at all that RTEMS would
> work for more than just RTEMS.
Well, it will work for anything which has the same call interface.
> The other thing with names is that standalone sure doesn't standalone
> when it uses U-Boot to do console IO for it. So when I was looking at
"standalone" is intended to mean "runs without OS". You just have
special requirements which don;t fit in the implemented model. [You
could work around these, though. For example you could implement a
"real" U-Boot standalone proram, which first disables interrupts,
then installs it's own exception vector table, and then goes on doing
whatever it likes to do.]
> the code and doing mkimage I saw the choices and though well my
> code wants to standalone, so the standalone image sounds good.
> Sure the README describes standalone very well, but it doesn't help
> when it seems to go against the dictionary definition of the word.
You are expected to read the documentation. It says: "runnable in the
environment provided by U-Boot" and "continue to work in U-Boot after
return from the Standalone Program".
> So I don't want to push for changing names around, but I hope you at
> least understand my confusion.
Maybe you can suggest a better description of "Standalone Programs"
that what's give in the README to avoid confusion like uyours?
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
This is a story about sex and drugs and Music with Rocks In. Well...
...one out of three ain't bad. Actually, it's only thirty-three per-
cent, but it could be worse. - Terry Pratchett, _Soul Music_
More information about the U-Boot