[U-Boot] Regarding 8641D u-boot
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Aug 18 16:14:23 CEST 2009
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Thirumalai wrote:
> Hi kumar,
> The CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT was not defined on the header file
> of HPCN but extended address translation was enabled on the start.S
> irrespective of the MPC8641D_hpcn compilation option why?.
>
> Regards,
> T.
Are you running into an issue with this? It could be to allow an OS
to have 36-bit addressing w/o u-boot having to deal with it.
- k
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list