[U-Boot] Regarding 8641D u-boot

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Aug 18 16:14:23 CEST 2009


On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Thirumalai wrote:

> Hi kumar,
>           The CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT was not defined on the header file  
> of HPCN but extended address translation was enabled on the start.S  
> irrespective of the  MPC8641D_hpcn compilation option why?.
>
> Regards,
> T.

Are you running into an issue with this?  It could be to allow an OS  
to have 36-bit addressing w/o u-boot having to deal with it.


- k


More information about the U-Boot mailing list