[U-Boot] Regarding 8641D u-boot

[Becky Bruce]

On Aug 18, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:

>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Thirumalai wrote:
>
>> Hi kumar,
>>          The CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT was not defined on the header file
>> of HPCN but extended address translation was enabled on the start.S
>> irrespective of the  MPC8641D_hpcn compilation option why?.
>>
>> Regards,
>> T.
>
> Are you running into an issue with this?  It could be to allow an OS
> to have 36-bit addressing w/o u-boot having to deal with it.

That's always been there (since the original board port), and it  
shouldn't cause a problem (or any performance issues), AFAIK.

Cheers,
Becky