[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Dirk Behme]

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>> On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please pull
>>>>> The following changes since commit 3aa8b68d80dbcb6829af60485c1e388b39af793d:
>>>>> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>>>>>       Merge branch 'next' of ../next
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
>>>>>
>>>>> Albin Tonnerre (3):
>>>>>     at91sam9260/afeb9260: Fix SPI initialization
>>>>>     Add support for the Calao SBC35-A9G20 board
>>>>>     Support for the Calao TNY-A9260/TNY-A9G20 boards
>>>>>
>>>>> Frederik Kriewitz (1):
>>>>>     Add support for the DevKit8000 board
>>>> I'd like to have the omap3_devkit8000.h version of that patch, instead.
>>> this one is fine no need not the omap3_devkit8000 version
>> Jean-Christophe: In
>>
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html
>>
>> we agreed on omap3_devkit8000.
> in v4 the author prefer it devkit8000 so I respect it

You missed v5 and v6, no?

> for the l2_cache I'm fine to move to omap3 as it's really omap3 specific

Again, you confuse people. From your previous mail:

"as I said now more than 10 times on omap3 we can use the generic 
ARMV7 cache code"

> we clearly need to clean the omap3 and not force other soc to duplicate code

With

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html

we just try to do the opposite: Move the custom code away so that 
Samsung can use its own (generic?) implementation.

Dirk