[U-Boot] ATMEL Custodians == /dev/null ??

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday, August 06, 2010 20:01:45 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> If, after considering my comments above, you still think you really need
> >> a custodian for AT91, I am game for it.
> > 
> > go for it
> 
> considering that both AVR32 and AT91 share most of the peripheral hardware
> building blocks, and therefore share the drivers, it seems to make sense to
> have an atmel custodian tree instead of avr32 and at91. Each change to a
> shared
> driver must (at least with MAKEALL) be checked for both architectures and
> adding it to both trees would make life unnecessary complicated...

yes, but the cores are going to be radically different.  so i imagine you'd be 
fine with the peripheral drivers, but not the avr32 core.  it's your time 
though of course.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20100806/1cb5b623/attachment.pgp