[U-Boot] AT91/AVR32: at91_emac.c VS macb.c in drivers/net

[Reinhard Meyer]

Hallo,

macb.c is known to work for AT91 and AVR32.

Why was at91_emac.c introduced into mainstream?

By name it suggests it is designed to work with AT91 (only)?

I don't think it is desireable to have to drivers doing the same task.

Unless someone has a good point why we need at91_emac.c I propose to
remove it from mainstream.

Best Regards,
Reinhard