[U-Boot] AT91/AVR32: at91_emac.c VS macb.c in drivers/net

[Ben Warren]

Hi Reinhard

On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Reinhard Meyer <u-boot at emk-elektronik.de> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> macb.c is known to work for AT91 and AVR32.
>
> Why was at91_emac.c introduced into mainstream?
>
> By name it suggests it is designed to work with AT91 (only)?
>
> I don't think it is desireable to have to drivers doing the same task.
>
> Unless someone has a good point why we need at91_emac.c I propose to
> remove it from mainstream.
>
If they really are for the same hardware block, then I agree.  For
this, though, you'll need to get many testers and 'Acked-by's.
> Best Regards,
> Reinhard
>
Regards,
Ben

> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>