[U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation
sandeep suresh
sandeep.suresh at yahoo.co.in
Tue Aug 24 11:50:01 CEST 2010
Dear Reinhard Meyer & All,
Apology for not sending to the mailing list; forwarding the same
to the mailing list. There is already a #define CONFIG_AT91SAM9260ek 1 in
/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h. I will check further.
Please help me if you have any clue further.
Thanks & regards
Sandeep Suresh.
________________________________
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot at emk-elektronik.de>
To: sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh at yahoo.co.in>; u-boot <u-boot at lists.denx.de>
Sent: Tue, 24 August, 2010 1:50:24 PM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation
Dear sandeep suresh,
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
> Appreciate your quick response. I had done this earlier
> before posting this mail, but with the same problem:
> step 1) export PATH=$PATH:/work/arm/4.3.2/bin
> step 2) make distclean
> step 3) make AT91SAM9260ek_config
> step 4)make
> Can you please help me further, please.
I can't help you with the following tasks:
1. find out what are the differences between 9260-EK and 9G20-EK ?
2. find out what subtle differences might exist between 9260 and 9G20 SoC?
It might be more than "AT91SAM9G20 = 400MHz version of AT91SAM9260"...
And I can't see in above transcript where you set the #define I mentioned.
"#ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20EK" exists in various places in the source, but
I do not know if that ever was a really working port or just someone
starting on it.
Reinhard
PS: it is mandatory to post replies to the mailing list as well!
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list