[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch
Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Sat Apr 16 08:22:49 CEST 2011
Hi all,
Le 15/04/2011 12:09, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>
> In message<201104150453.21441.vapier at gentoo.org> you wrote:
>>
>>>> On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>>> #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)&& \
>>>>> - !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)&& \
>>>>> + !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)&& \
>>>>
>>>> not sure this one hunk is desirable, but the rest are fine
>>>> -mike
>>>
>>> Do you mean the replacement with space to ident?
>>>
>>> According to the 2.6.38.1's checkpatch, it reported:
>>> WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
>>
>> this particular check has already been posted upstream as generally causing
>> more harm than good. but getting checkpatch fixed often feels glacial.
Been there too, once. :(
>> up to Wolfgang how he feels about ifdef indentation
>
> In this specific case of #ifdef indentation I feel that the original
> form (which causes checkpatch warnings) is actually easier to read, so
> I tend to keep it. But I am aware that this is inconsequent as we ask
> for "indentation by TAB only" everywhere else.
>
> So I'm really torn - if it was for myself only I would not hesitate to
> leave this part as is, but I realize that quite a number of users have
> already complained about the unclear rules and exceptions we make with
> the coding style requirements, and some actually threw in the sponge
> because of that.
>
> I'm afraid I'm not much of help here.
If the goal is to have the !defined aligned, then maybe a solution here
would be toput a tab rather than a space after the #if?
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list