[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Let linker create phy array

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Le 06/02/2012 21:17, Troy Kisky a écrit :
> On 2/6/2012 12:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 06 February 2012 13:48:13 Troy Kisky wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2012 8:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:46 Troy Kisky wrote:
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>>>>>
>>>>> -static struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver = {
>>>>> +struct phy_driver BCM5461S_driver __phy_entry = {
>>>> why do you have to remove the static ? that shouldn't affect the
>>>> section
>>>> name that it gets placed into.
>>> I had static to start. But the compiler ate all of the code. No
>>> references to any of the static symbols.
>> sounds like you should change the __phy_entry define from "unused" to
>> "used"
>> -mike
> The would give me compiler warnings for unused variables. How does that
> help?
> Is there a keep attribute like the linker has for sections?

No, but indeed not keeping the 'static' keyword has this effect: the 
object file will keep the phy struct, in case it is referred to by 
another object file at link time.

> Troy

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.