[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] bootstage: Add microsecond boot time measurement

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Feb 14 00:27:04 CET 2012


Hi Mike,

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Saturday 14 January 2012 20:16:35 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 12 January 2012 00:41:24 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> >> Still don't quite get it though. For example, the beagle board
> defines
> >> >> show_boot_progress() but does not define CONFIG_SHOW_BOOT_PROGRESS,
> so
> >> >> wouldn't that break that board?
> >> >
> >> > that sounds like an odd-man-out that needs fixing rather than
> allowing to
> >> > live
> >>
> >> Fair enough. although I suspect there will be many. If I could
> >> actually get a MAKEALL to run without producing 100s of broken boards
> >> then it would be easier to do this sort of thing. At the moment it's
> >> like looking for a needle in a haystack. My warnings series aimed to
> >> improve things slightly, but I don't think others have these problems.
> >
> > that's fair.  if it's a small # of boards, i'd prefer to migrate them.
>  if
> > it's a lot more, we can punt for now (add to the TODO?) and add comments
> to
> > the code why we have these checks.
>
> OK, I don't know the answer to that but will try it out, and adjust
> that patch as needed.
>

I have got back to this now - it seem that I can rely on the existing weak
function, so I will do so.

I only want to update two of the patches, so will just send those ones. The
rest should be fine as is.

Regards,
SImon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list