[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] fdt: Deal correctly with alias nodes

[Marek Vasut]

> Marek/Simon,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
> > Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:55 PM
> > To: Marek Vasut; Tom Warren
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] fdt: Deal correctly with alias
> > nodes
> > 
> > +Tom, tegra maintainer
> > 
> > Hi Marek,
> > 
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > >> This series proposes a new way to deal with alias nodes and
> > >> introduces a function to take care of it.
> > >> 
> > >> It includes an example of converting USB code over to use this new
> > >> function.
> > >> 
> > >> Note: At present it does not deal automatically with disabled nodes,
> > >> but perhaps it should? Or perhaps this is better as an option.
> > >> Something to leave for later perhaps.
> > >> 
> > >> Note 2: The actual logic of this function is not properly tested yet.
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Simon Glass (2):
> > >>   fdt: Add fdtdec_find_aliases() to deal with alias nodes
> > >>   tegra: Use fdtdec_find_aliases() to find USB ports
> > >> 
> > >>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/usb.c |   17 ++++----
> > >>  include/fdtdec.h                |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>  lib/fdtdec.c                    |   89
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 148
> > >> insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > what's the status of this patch/patchset?
> > 
> > I believe it is sitting in the tegra tree ready for a pull request, but
> > waiting on USB. Tom will know.
> 
> Simon is correct. The 18 fdt/USB patches (v5 and 2 from v6) are sitting in
> u-boot-tegra/test waiting on a final ACK for one clock binding DT change
> from Simon based on Stephen's review. As Simon says in answer to a
> separate email, he's working on getting all these to jibe so that I can
> apply them cleanly to u-boot-tegra. As soon as they're ready, I'll apply &
> test and if all goes well, submit a pull request. Then we can move on the
> I2C, LCD, kbd, etc. for Tegra2.
> 
That's good then, I won't care for these and let them go through the tegra tree. 
Thank you for your good work.

M