[U-Boot] Nand dump and nand bad block disagree
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Wed Feb 29 20:06:27 CET 2012
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:02:39 jean-philippe francois wrote:
> Le 29 février 2012 00:40, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> a écrit :
> > Is this a 16-bit NAND? If so, the first two bytes have to be 0xffff,
> > unless the controller driver defines the bad block pattern differently.
>
> It is an 8 bit nand. The badblock patern can be redefined by the controller
> driver to be different from the one in nand_base.c ? Do you have an example
> of this ?
look at the Blackfin nand driver (in u-boot and linux). we have to override
the badblock layout because our on-chip boot rom expects something other than
what linux uses.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120229/68d76c6d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list