[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] arm926: Flush the data cache before disabling it.
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 16:01:31 CET 2012
> On Wed Jan 11, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > Changing the ecc layout for a single board, hmm not sure. Using a
> > > > spl instead does me no harm whatsoever -- I don't need to update
> > > > the spl frequently in any case, and then can use the nand driver
> > > > as is.
> > >
> > > And how do you replace the SPL?
> > >
> > > Either way, I think the correct approach is to allow the driver to
> > > handle the SPL update too.
> >
> > Or rather -- to be able to load u-boot directly. It seems to be more
> > correct solution. The SPL you're using is just a workaround and also you
> > need to TI flasher to replace it, right ?
>
> Yes, using the spl is a workaround, and like i mentioned in my
> previous mail, i thought having the spl was not a problem on the
> hawkboard. I had thought putting a new oob layout in the common
> davinci nand driver for a single board to be not a clean fix
> either.
Then just allow the driver to be passed different OOB layout and make the
current one a default
> More so, given the fact that we don't have any control over
> rbl -- so if rbl changes it's layout for any subsequent board, we'd
> have to add that as well to the nand driver, and both in u-boot as
> well as the kernel.
>
> I guess the cleanest solution would have been for the rbl to have
> used the same layout as the one used by u-boot and linux.
Yep, why not do that then?
>
> Btw, can you please review this change, that this patch
> fixes. ACK/NAK?
I'll think about it. It's ok, but it piles one workaround on top of another one,
I don't like that approach.
M
>
> -sughosh
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list