[U-Boot] [PATCH 02/28] net: cosmetic: checkpatch compliance
Joe Hershberger
joe.hershberger at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 21:21:10 CET 2012
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
>> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
>> ---
>> common/main.c | 1 -
>> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 122 +++++++++--------
>> include/common.h | 4 +
>> include/net.h | 123 +++++++++--------
>> net/bootp.c | 338 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> net/bootp.h | 56 ++++----
>> net/eth.c | 66 +++++-----
>> net/net.c | 19 +--
>> net/nfs.c | 300 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> net/nfs.h | 2 +-
>> net/rarp.c | 28 ++--
>> net/rarp.h | 4 +-
>> net/sntp.c | 31 +++--
>> net/sntp.h | 2 +-
>> net/tftp.c | 30 ++---
>> net/tftp.h | 2 +-
>> 16 files changed, 572 insertions(+), 556 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Others may fine with it, but it might be worth splitting this very
> long patch, perhaps split out some of the larger files or the
> show_activity() change.
I had this separated by file, but figured since the series was pretty
long, it is all cosmetic (making separate patches not especially
helpful), and it was under the 100kB mail limit that it would be
better as a single patch. If it will be a barrier to review, I can
split it up again.
Best regards,
-Joe
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list