[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to km_kirkwood

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2012 18:31
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp;
> albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> km_kirkwood
> 
> On 07/03/2012 02:38 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> >> Sent: 03 July 2012 18:02
> >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> >> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp;
> >> albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> >> km_kirkwood
> >>
> >> On 07/03/2012 01:19 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> >>>> Sent: 03 July 2012 16:08
> >>>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> >>>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> >>>> km_kirkwood
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Prafulla,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/03/2012 10:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> >>>>>> Sent: 13 June 2012 19:03
> >>>>>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>>>>> Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar
> >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> >>>>>> km_kirkwood
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Use the generic header km_kirkwood.h and get rid of the
> >>>>>> board specific header.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck at keymile.com>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp
> >> <valentin.longchamp at keymile.com>
> >>>>>> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla at marvell.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> changes for v2:
> >>>>>>    - rebased because of changes in other patches
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |    9 ++--
> >>>>>>  boards.cfg                    |    2 +-
> >>>>>>  include/configs/km_kirkwood.h |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>  include/configs/mgcoge3un.h   |   87 -------------------------
> --
> >> --
> >>>> ---
> >>>>>> ---------
> >>>>>>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>  delete mode 100644 include/configs/mgcoge3un.h
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch makes sense to me since it since it shrinks overall
> >> code.
> >>>>> Doe not have dependency in patch series, can be accepted if
> >> outside
> >>>> the series.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> again, but there are a lot of dependencies between 01-02 and 03-
> 04
> >>>> because all
> >>>> doing a lot in km_kirkwood.h.  So do you have any particular
> >>>> objections against
> >>>> the first two patches, beside your input for the kwbimage.cfg
> which
> >> I
> >>>> answered
> >>>> in a different mail?
> >>>
> >>> As I suggested earlier
> >>>
> >>> You may have patch series for the bugfixes/improvements to the
> >> currently supported code.
> >>>
> >>> You may have new board support as separate patch, if those have
> >> dependency, get it addressed first.
> >>>
> >>> As such I do not have any objection about longer patch series but
> >>> Generally having a long patch series requires longer time to be
> get
> >> pulled in.
> >>>
> >>
> >> so and when do you think to pull this in? AFAIK we are shortly
> before
> >> rc1. And I
> >> would like to  see this in, everything was published before the
> merge
> >> window was
> >> closed and we have reacted on every input you gave. But we can't
> react
> >> on inputs
> >> which are not clearly stated.
> >>
> >> So how do we proceed here to get this in for v2012.07? If I
> summarize
> >> the
> >> situation you don't have any particular objections against 01-08 of
> >> this series.
> >> So should I resend these eight patches as a standalone serie to get
> at
> >> least
> >> these patches in?
> >
> > Yes, Please send the patch series for bug fix and improvements ONLY,
> I will pull them ASAP.
> >
> > The others we can converge soon.
> >
> 
> But 01-08 are not only bugfixes there are also two new boards in these
> patches.
> So will you pull these eight patches in if I post them again without
> 09-14?

Pls post bug fixes and improvement patches first those will be pulled faster.

Regards...
Prafulla . . .