[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to km_kirkwood

[Holger Brunck]

On 07/03/2012 03:07 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch makes sense to me since it since it shrinks overall
>>>> code.
>>>>>>> Doe not have dependency in patch series, can be accepted if
>>>> outside
>>>>>> the series.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> again, but there are a lot of dependencies between 01-02 and 03-
>> 04
>>>>>> because all
>>>>>> doing a lot in km_kirkwood.h.  So do you have any particular
>>>>>> objections against
>>>>>> the first two patches, beside your input for the kwbimage.cfg
>> which
>>>> I
>>>>>> answered
>>>>>> in a different mail?
>>>>>
>>>>> As I suggested earlier
>>>>>
>>>>> You may have patch series for the bugfixes/improvements to the
>>>> currently supported code.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may have new board support as separate patch, if those have
>>>> dependency, get it addressed first.
>>>>>
>>>>> As such I do not have any objection about longer patch series but
>>>>> Generally having a long patch series requires longer time to be
>> get
>>>> pulled in.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so and when do you think to pull this in? AFAIK we are shortly
>> before
>>>> rc1. And I
>>>> would like to  see this in, everything was published before the
>> merge
>>>> window was
>>>> closed and we have reacted on every input you gave. But we can't
>> react
>>>> on inputs
>>>> which are not clearly stated.
>>>>
>>>> So how do we proceed here to get this in for v2012.07? If I
>> summarize
>>>> the
>>>> situation you don't have any particular objections against 01-08 of
>>>> this series.
>>>> So should I resend these eight patches as a standalone serie to get
>> at
>>>> least
>>>> these patches in?
>>>
>>> Yes, Please send the patch series for bug fix and improvements ONLY,
>> I will pull them ASAP.
>>>
>>> The others we can converge soon.
>>>
>>
>> But 01-08 are not only bugfixes there are also two new boards in these
>> patches.
>> So will you pull these eight patches in if I post them again without
>> 09-14?
> 
> Pls post bug fixes and improvement patches first those will be pulled faster.
> 
This was already done from my side:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-May/125219.html

Sorry Prafulla but I have admit that this whole discussion costs a lot of time
which I do not have. We are moving in circles your last comment was already
discussed several times e.g.:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-June/126081.html

So again you have no specific inputs of improvements for 01-08 right? All you
rephrase are some general comments which are not very helpfull to improve our
situation and to get our own board code into mainline.

We try to stick to every rule which is valid for u-boot development. But we
can't stick to rules which are not clearly stated.

Regards
Holger