[U-Boot] i.MX6: mx6qsabrelite: allow use with Freescale 2.6.38 kernels
mailander
mailander at gmx.de
Sat Mar 3 11:43:11 CET 2012
On 03/03/2012 10:38, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
>
> In message <4F51BBA9.4090608 at googlemail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Having Freescale working on these quite old and unclean U-Boot and
>> Kernel versions is a pain. Kernel is an other topic, but with U-Boot,
>> thanks to the very good work of everybody, we are in a good position
>> to get rid of the old Freescale U-Boot, now. And get everybody to work
>> with mainline and create patches against it.
>
> ACK.
>
>> So if it helps to apply some backward compatibility to make it easier
>> for everybody, esp. Freescale, to switch to mainline U-Boot, I think
>> we should try it.
>
> Agreed. If these patches were only for backward compatibility I would
> not complain much. But they are known to introduce forward incompati-
> bilities with all this MACH_ID stuff, and this is what I would like to
> avoid.
>
> I think we should make a clear statement that new boards that get
> added should only support DT based configurations. If really needed,
> legacy MACH_ID support may be kept out of tree.
I think a point here is that boards must not use any macro defined in
mach-types.h, such as machine_is_*. U-Boot does not need it, and their
usage makes the code strictly dependent from the kernel legacy mach-ids.
If a board defines only CONFIG_MACH_TYPE in its own configuration file,
it should not break if we decide in future to drop it completely.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list