[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] GPIO: Extend the cmd_gpio API by gpio_{from, to}_string()
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Mon May 14 20:25:14 CEST 2012
Dear Mike Frysinger,
> On Monday 14 May 2012 07:31:35 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Mike Frysinger,
> >
> > > On Tuesday 01 May 2012 16:50:14 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > The gpio_from_string() call shall parse the incoming GPIO name taken
> > > > from the command line and return the GPIO number used within U-Boot
> > > > or return -1 on error.
> > >
> > > i.e. the already existing name_to_gpio() func
> >
> > You mean blackfin specific macro crap? Let's actually drop that and
> > switch over to this one. That was my intention from start.
>
> don't spout this crap. try reading the actual history on the lists for the
> background on the naming, and then try actually grepping the tree to see
> that multiple targets implement it.
Can you point me to something? This is the result of git grep, so I odn't see it
used at all.
arch/blackfin/include/asm/gpio.h:static inline int name_to_gpio(const char
*name)
arch/blackfin/include/asm/gpio.h:#define name_to_gpio(n) name_to_gpio(n)
common/cmd_gpio.c:#ifndef name_to_gpio
common/cmd_gpio.c:#define name_to_gpio(name) simple_strtoul(name, NULL, 10)
common/cmd_gpio.c: return name_to_gpio(name);
> > > > The gpio_to_string() on the other hand allows nicer reporting of GPIO
> > > > name in the output of cmd_gpio.
> > >
> > > i don't see the value in this. we already have the string name from
> > > the
> > >
> > > user, so all you've implemented is:
> > > gpio_to_string(gpio_from_string(argv[]))
> > >
> > > at which point, argv[] works fine.
> >
> > This allows for taking multiple different inputs, while reporting one
> > unified output.
>
> sounds like unnecessary bloat
Now you're spouting crap, it makes sense to be able to report the name
consistently.
> -mike
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list