[U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model
Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Thu Oct 11 20:45:02 CEST 2012
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:13:33 -0500, Scott Wood
<scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> FWIW I think putting policy documents in a wiki, without any
> guidance on who's supposed to edit it or how changes get approved, is a
> bad idea. Why not put policy documents in the git-managed source
> tree? And changes would be
> proposed, discussed, and accepted/rejected like any other change. Plus
> there'd be at least a chance of a commit message showing rationale.
While I can see the benefits you find in this, is it not based on
the unspoken axiom that the project's policies should necessarily be
subject to a democratic process? Plus... in order for this process to
be put in place, a process should be defined for discussing this
process... argh. :)
> In any case, if this is the policy, we should not be saying that we
> follow the Linux policy.
Agreed -- see Stephen's reply rightly correcting me re Linux.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list