[U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] [PATCH 01/11] DM: add block device core
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Fri Sep 21 14:39:42 CEST 2012
Dear Pavel Herrmann,
> Hi
>
> On Friday 21 of September 2012 02:19:00 Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis at gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
> > > This core will register all block devices (disk, cards, partitons) and
> > > provide unfied access to them, instead of current method with device +
> > > partition offset
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Herrmann <morpheus.ibis at gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/blockdev/Makefile | 42 ++++++++++++++++
> > > include/dm/blockdev.h | 121
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 164
> > > insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/blockdev/Makefile
> > > create mode 100644 include/dm/blockdev.h
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > +struct blockdev_ops {
> > > + lbaint_t (*read)(struct instance *inst, lbaint_t start,
> > > + lbaint_t blkcnt, void *buffer);
> > > + lbaint_t (*write)(struct instance *inst, lbaint_t start,
> > > + lbaint_t blkcnt, void *buffer);
> > > + lbaint_t (*erase)(struct instance *inst, lbaint_t start,
> > > + lbaint_t blkcnt);
> >
> > lbaint_t is little "cryptic". Any better name suggestions?
>
> lbaint_t is an unsigned 32bit or 64bit number, depending on state of
> CONFIG_LBA48.
>
> It was chosen because some parts of current block code use it as well, but
> we can pretty much replace it with size_t (and assume CONFIG_LBA48 is
> always on)
lbaint_t seems ok indeed.
> Pavel Herrmann
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list