[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 8/8] mpc85xx: introduce the kmp204x reference design support

[Scott Wood]

On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 08:28 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 02:48 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 17:50 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> >> On 08/13/2013 11:38 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:02 +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> >>>> This patch introduces the support for Keymile's kmp204x reference
> >>>> design. This design is based on Freescale's P2040/P2041 SoC.
> >>>>
> >>>> The peripherals used by this design are:
> >>>> - DDR3 RAM with SPD support
> >>>> - SPI NOR Flash as boot medium
> >>>> - NAND Flash
> >>>> - 2 PCIe busses (hosts 1 and 3)
> >>>> - 3 FMAN Ethernet devices (FMAN1 DTSEC1/2/5)
> >>>> - 3 Local Bus windows, with one dedicated to the QRIO reset/power mgmt
> >>>>   FPGA
> >>>> - 2 HW I2C busses
> >>>> - last but not least, the mandatory serial port
> >>>>
> >>>> The board/keymile/kmp204x code is mostly based on Freescale's P2041rdb
> >>>> support and was changed according to our design (that means essentially
> >>>> removing what is not present on the designs and a few adaptations).
> >>>
> >>> A lot of the copied files have had Freescale copyrights removed...  Also
> >>> please try to factor shared code out rather than duplicate, where
> >>> practical.
> >>
> >> Well, I had tried to come a first proposal that factored shared code but I was
> >> advised to copy the code: [1]. For the copyrights I will fix it.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> > 
> > Did you mean to cite something here?
> > 
> 
> Oops, yes sorry:
> http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/RFC-PATCH-mpc85xx-move-generic-corenet-to-cpu-mpc85xxx-tt153910.html#none
> 

I think the problem there was that you shared too much, not that sharing
is bad in general.

-Scott