[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 0/13] Driver model implementation, tests, demo and GPIO

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On 3 December 2013 14:34, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On 2 December 2013 13:27, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >> > +Tom
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On 2 December 2013 12:02, Mateusz Zalega <m.zalega at samsung.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 11/29/13 02:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> >>> How come 13/13 is missing?
> >> >>
> >> >> It's not.
> >> >
> >> > I think it was missing until someone approved it, since it was over
> >> > the 100KB limit.
> >>
> >> What do you think of this series? Do you think it is ready to apply?
> >
> > I think we're where it needs wider testing now, yes.  But given that
> > we've stumbled onto another problem or two with the bootm refactoring
> > series, I'm really hesitant to pull something else big in for this
> > release.  Kbuild style Makefiles this time, start DM for v2014.04 is my
> > plan currently.
> 
> Sounds reasonable. It's ready to go, hopefully won't need a lot of
> care and feeding before then.
> 
> Re bootm I am still not thrilled with the outcome. We flushed out
> quite a few cases in dark corners at great expense, but don't have a
> lot of automated tests (only the vboot test actually runs bootm I
> think). Any ideas on what we should do here?

Well, did you see where Michal's test case was?  It looks like that
should fail anywhere, not just microblaze.  For now, I really just want
to get this latest bug fixed.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131203/e3d8ec85/attachment.pgp>