[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 0/13] Driver model implementation, tests, demo and GPIO

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On 3 December 2013 14:54, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 3 December 2013 14:34, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> On 2 December 2013 13:27, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> >> > +Tom
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2 December 2013 12:02, Mateusz Zalega <m.zalega at samsung.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On 11/29/13 02:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> >> >>> How come 13/13 is missing?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's not.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think it was missing until someone approved it, since it was over
>> >> > the 100KB limit.
>> >>
>> >> What do you think of this series? Do you think it is ready to apply?
>> >
>> > I think we're where it needs wider testing now, yes.  But given that
>> > we've stumbled onto another problem or two with the bootm refactoring
>> > series, I'm really hesitant to pull something else big in for this
>> > release.  Kbuild style Makefiles this time, start DM for v2014.04 is my
>> > plan currently.
>>
>> Sounds reasonable. It's ready to go, hopefully won't need a lot of
>> care and feeding before then.
>>
>> Re bootm I am still not thrilled with the outcome. We flushed out
>> quite a few cases in dark corners at great expense, but don't have a
>> lot of automated tests (only the vboot test actually runs bootm I
>> think). Any ideas on what we should do here?
>
> Well, did you see where Michal's test case was?  It looks like that
> should fail anywhere, not just microblaze.  For now, I really just want
> to get this latest bug fixed.

OK I see it, will take a look.

Regards,
Simon