[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 5/9] EXYNOS5: DWMMC: API to set mmc clock divisor

Amarendra Reddy amar.lavanuru at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 15:34:56 CET 2013


Hi Jaehoon,
 Thanks for the comments.
Please find my response below.

Thanks & Regards
Amarendra


On 3 January 2013 16:46, Amarendra Reddy <amar.lavanuru at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jaehoon,
>  Thanks for the comments.
> Please find my response below.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Amarendra
>
>
>
>  On 3 January 2013 12:15, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amar,
>>
>> ..snip..
>> >> I didn't understand this function(exynos5_mmc_set_clk_div?).
>> >> What purpose? I think good that proper to use the "div" as argument.
>> >> void exynos5_mmc_set_clk(int dev_id, unsigned int div).
>> >
>> >
>> > For fixing dwmmc driver, I referred to working code from
>> > "chromiumos/src/third_party/u-boot".
>> > In chromium uboot, during mhci init, the function "clock_set_mshci()" is
>> > called which is in "arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos5/clock.c"
>> >
>> > Our function "*exynos5_mmc_set_clk_div()"* is same as
>> "*clock_set_mshci()".*
>> >
>> > Now coming to 'div' as argument .... we have the below scenarios /
>> questions
>> > 1-> What is the value of 'div' to be passed from calling function ?
>> It will be the pre_ratio's value for FSYSx register.
>>
> OK.
>
>>
>> > 2-> The value of 'div' needs to be computed in calling function.
>> It will be computed before called this function. For example, in dw_mmc.c
>> or exynos_dw_mc.c
>>
>
>
>> OK.
>>
>> > 3-> As per my understanding, 'div' value depends on values of MPLL clock
>> > and FSYS1/2.
>> Right..but it will be changed the source clock. MMC/SD can use the every
>> source clock.
>>
>> OK.
>
>> > 4-> *Question:* Is it OK to put the piece of code which accesses MPLL,
>> > FSYS1, FSYS2 in drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c. ?
>> Sure..we can use the get_mmc_clk/set_mmc_clk. then we can get source
>> clock value.
>> and compute the div value for request clock.
>>
>
>
>> OK. I will change accordingly.
>>
>> Ok, using the existing function "set_mmc_clk()" will do the job.
I will remove the new function "exynos5_mmc_set_clk_div()" in next patch.


>   > 5-> If we compute 'div' value in "drivers/mmc/exynos_dw_mmc.c", then
>> > there will be duplication of code (Read of FSYS1/2).
>> What code is duplication? Could you explain to me more?
>> Only need to compute the div value in exynos_dw_mmc.c.
>> why need to compute into here?
>> Sorry..there is no duplication. I thought that reading fsys1/2 will be
>> done at two places.
>>  Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>>  >
>> > Please comment on the above.
>> >
>> >> +
>> >>  /* get_lcd_clk: return lcd clock frequency */
>> >>  static unsigned long exynos4_get_lcd_clk(void)
>> >>  {
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> >> index 1935b0b..2fd7c3e 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> >> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
>> >>  #define VPLL 4
>> >>  #define BPLL 5
>> >>
>> >> +#define FSYS1_MMC0_DIV_MASK  0xff0f
>> >> +#define FSYS1_MMC0_DIV_VAL   0x0701
>> >> +
>> >>  unsigned long get_pll_clk(int pllreg);
>> >>  unsigned long get_arm_clk(void);
>> >>  unsigned long get_i2c_clk(void);
>> >> @@ -36,6 +39,7 @@ unsigned long get_pwm_clk(void);
>> >>  unsigned long get_uart_clk(int dev_index);
>> >>  unsigned long get_mmc_clk(int dev_index);
>> >>  void set_mmc_clk(int dev_index, unsigned int div);
>> >> +int exynos5_mmc_set_clk_div(int dev_index);
>> >>  unsigned long get_lcd_clk(void);
>> >>  void set_lcd_clk(void);
>> >>  void set_mipi_clk(void);
>> >>
>> >
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> >> U-Boot mailing list
>> >> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> >> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > U-Boot mailing list
>> > U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>> >
>>
>>
>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list