[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: Allow use outside of u-boot tree

Vadim Bendebury vbendeb at chromium.org
Wed Jan 9 23:07:59 CET 2013


On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb at chromium.org> wrote:
> To make it usable in git trees not providing a patch checker
> implementation, add a command line option, allowing to suppress patch
> check. While we are at it, sort debug options alphabetically.
>
>    . unit test passes:
>     $ ./patman  -t
>     <unittest.result.TestResult run=7 errors=0 failures=0>
>    . successfully used patman in the autotest tree to generate a patch
>      email (with --no-check option)
>    . successfully used patman in the u-boot tree to generate a patch
>      email
>    . `patman --help' now shows command line options ordered
>      alphabetically
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb at chromium.org>
> ---
>  tools/patman/patman.py |   14 ++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/patman/patman.py b/tools/patman/patman.py
> index e56dd01..6620a48 100755
> --- a/tools/patman/patman.py
> +++ b/tools/patman/patman.py
> @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ parser.add_option('-i', '--ignore-errors', action='store_true',
>         help='Send patches email even if patch errors are found')
>  parser.add_option('-n', '--dry-run', action='store_true', dest='dry_run',
>         default=False, help="Do a try run (create but don't email patches)")
> +parser.add_option('-p', '--project', default=project.DetectProject(),
> +                  help="Project name; affects default option values and "
> +                  "aliases [default: %default]")
>  parser.add_option('-s', '--start', dest='start', type='int',
>         default=0, help='Commit to start creating patches from (0 = HEAD)')
>  parser.add_option('-t', '--test', action='store_true', dest='test',
> @@ -58,11 +61,11 @@ parser.add_option('-v', '--verbose', action='store_true', dest='verbose',
>         default=False, help='Verbose output of errors and warnings')
>  parser.add_option('--cc-cmd', dest='cc_cmd', type='string', action='store',
>         default=None, help='Output cc list for patch file (used by git)')
> +parser.add_option('--no-check', action='store_true', dest='no_check',
> +                  default=False,
> +                  help="Don't check for patch compliance")
>  parser.add_option('--no-tags', action='store_false', dest='process_tags',
>                    default=True, help="Don't process subject tags as aliaes")
> -parser.add_option('-p', '--project', default=project.DetectProject(),
> -                  help="Project name; affects default option values and "
> -                  "aliases [default: %default]")
>
>  parser.usage = """patman [options]
>
> @@ -146,7 +149,10 @@ else:
>      series.DoChecks()
>
>      # Check the patches, and run them through 'git am' just to be sure
> -    ok = checkpatch.CheckPatches(options.verbose, args)
> +    if options.no_check:
> +        ok = True
> +    else:
> +        ok = checkpatch.CheckPatches(options.verbose, args)
>      if not gitutil.ApplyPatches(options.verbose, args,
>              options.count + options.start):
>          ok = False
> --
> 1.7.7.3
>

Doug, thank you for a prompt review, copying your response here,
please see below:

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
> Vadim,
>
> Thanks for the patch!  Looks good in general, though please add the
> "patman" prefix to the first line of your commit message.
>

done

>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb at chromium.org> wrote:
>> To make it usable in git trees not providing a patch checker
>> implementation, add a command line option, allowing to suippress patch
>
> s/suippress/suppress
>

done

>> +parser.add_option('--no-check', action='store_true', dest='no_check',
>> +                  default=False,
>> +                  help="Don't check for patch compliance")
>
> IMHO It would be slightly better to use action='store_false',
> dest='check', and default=True (just to avoid so many
> double-negatives).

I don't quite agree with this part - I think it's perfectly reasonable
to use 'no-check' to suppress the check, just as well as to use
'no-tags' to suppress interpreting tags.

`--no' communicates that by default the respective feature is enabled,
and to disable it one needs to add a command line option with no
parameter.

cheers,
/vb


More information about the U-Boot mailing list