[U-Boot] [PATCH V5 03/10] DWMMC: Initialise dwmci and resolve EMMC read write issues
Jaehoon Chung
jh80.chung at samsung.com
Tue Jan 22 07:54:43 CET 2013
On 01/22/2013 02:55 PM, Amarendra Reddy wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> The 'timeout' value cant be removed as it is being used.
Sorry..i missed it.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Amarendra
>
> On 22 January 2013 08:14, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amar,
>>
>> On 01/21/2013 08:43 PM, Amar wrote:
>>> This patch enumerates dwmci and set auto stop command during
>>> dwmci initialisation.
>>> EMMC read/write is not happening in current implementation
>>> due to improper fifo size computation. Hence Modified the fifo size
>>> computation to resolve EMMC read write issues.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amar <amarendra.xt at samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since V1:
>>> 1)Created the macros RX_WMARK_SHIFT and RX_WMARK_MASK in header
>> file.
>>>
>>> Changes since V2:
>>> 1)Updation of commit message and resubmition of proper patch set.
>>>
>>> Changes since V3:
>>> 1)Updated to use the macro DWMCI_CTRL_SEND_AS_CCSD instead of
>>> the hard coded value (1 << 10).
>>>
>>> Changes since V4:
>>> 1)Updated the function dwmci_send_cmd() to use get_timer()
>> instead
>>> of using mdelay(1).
>>>
>>> drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c
>>> index 4070d4e..391ed93 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c
>>> @@ -129,13 +129,13 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct
>> mmc_cmd *cmd,
>>> unsigned int timeout = 100000;
>> We can remove the timeout value.
>> If you remove this, it looks good to me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>> > u32 retry = 10000;
>>> u32 mask, ctrl;
>>> + ulong start = get_timer(0);
>>>
>>> while (dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_STATUS) & DWMCI_BUSY) {
>>> - if (timeout == 0) {
>>> + if (get_timer(start) > timeout) {
>>> printf("Timeout on data busy\n");
>>> return TIMEOUT;
>>> }
>>> - timeout--;
>>> }
>>>
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, DWMCI_INTMSK_ALL);
>>> @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct
>> mmc_cmd *cmd,
>>> if (data)
>>> dwmci_prepare_data(host, data);
>>>
>>> -
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CMDARG, cmd->cmdarg);
>>>
>>> if (data)
>>> @@ -314,7 +313,7 @@ static void dwmci_set_ios(struct mmc *mmc)
>>> static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)
>>> {
>>> struct dwmci_host *host = (struct dwmci_host *)mmc->priv;
>>> - u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val;
>>> + u32 fifo_size, fifoth_val, ier;
>>>
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_PWREN, 1);
>>>
>>> @@ -323,6 +322,14 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)
>>> return -1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Enumerate at 400KHz */
>>> + dwmci_setup_bus(host, mmc->f_min);
>>> +
>>> + /* Set auto stop command */
>>> + ier = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_CTRL);
>>> + ier |= DWMCI_CTRL_SEND_AS_CCSD;
>>> + dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CTRL, ier);
>>> +
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_INTMASK, 0);
>>>
>>> @@ -332,11 +339,13 @@ static int dwmci_init(struct mmc *mmc)
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_BMOD, 1);
>>>
>>> fifo_size = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH);
>>> + fifo_size = ((fifo_size & RX_WMARK_MASK) >> RX_WMARK_SHIFT) + 1;
>>> if (host->fifoth_val)
>>> fifoth_val = host->fifoth_val;
>>> - else
>>> - fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size/2 -1) |
>>> - TX_WMARK(fifo_size/2);
>>> + else {
>>> + fifoth_val = MSIZE(0x2) | RX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2 - 1) |
>>> + TX_WMARK(fifo_size / 2);
>>> + }
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_FIFOTH, fifoth_val);
>>>
>>> dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_CLKENA, 0);
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list