[U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] tegra20: switch over seaboard and ventana to use tablebased pinmux
Lucas Stach
dev at lynxeye.de
Fri Jan 25 22:57:34 CET 2013
Am Samstag, den 26.01.2013, 10:49 +1300 schrieb Simon Glass:
[...]
> > But yes in the end we want to pack this information into the DT files.
> > But even then it would be nice if people would test this pachset, as I
> > imagine DT based pinmux is the same as tablebased pinmux, just in a
> > slightly different flavour. ;) So if people test the tablebased config
> > now, we can do the conversion to DT based with a lot more confidence.
> >
> > I'll look into using the kernel pinmux binding minus the MUX stuff, as I
> > think there's no real reason to have this in U-Boot.
>
> Well I would rather than we get that running than switch to
> table-driven mux, assuming it is not too big a job?
>
> I imagine perhaps naively that a function could be written which
> parses the pinmux and sets it up in U-Boot - effectively using the FDT
> as the pinmux table.
That's my plan. But still even if we keep the binding the same, the
actual pinmux config would differ between the kernel and U-Boot (a lot
more pads kept in tristate in U-Boot). So as the FDT would effectively
resemble the same tables I included in this patchset, some testing
coverage of that would smoothen the transition.
Regards,
Lucas
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list