[U-Boot] Strange CFI flash problem

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Tue Apr 15 19:27:53 CEST 2014


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Matthias Weißer <weisserm at arcor.de> wrote:
> Am 14.04.2014 17:38, schrieb Kees Cook:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthias Weißer <weisserm at arcor.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 14.04.2014 08:09, schrieb Matthias Weißer:
>>>
>>>> Hi Wolfgang
>>>>
>>>> Am 11.04.2014 12:43, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>>>
>>>>> In message <5347BBBC.9000806 at arcor.de> you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we are currently trying to get an out-of-tree board based on 2013.01
>>>>>> back in sync with current master and observing a strange behavior
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> we think is located in the CFI flash system. If we load an image via
>>>>>> tftp, copy it to flash and then try to run the image via bootm we see
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> error while decomressing:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Uncompressing Kernel Image ... LZO: uncompress or overwrite error
>>>>>> -5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure your malloc arena is big enough for LZO?  Try if
>>>>> increasing it helps...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We increaded it from 4MB to 8MB and the behavior is still the same.
>>>>
>>>> We also observed a different behavior when tftping the image to RAM and
>>>> then directly executing it without copying it to flash. It seems that
>>>> the flash device (EN29GL256H) is then in some a mode (maybe auto-select)
>>>> which prevents it from normal read operations which doesn't allow the
>>>> flash driver of the OS come up. We never saw this with our old u-boot.
>>>> If there are no ideas left we will have to bisect the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bisecting was successfull. The commit introducing the problem is
>>>
>>> commit ff9d2efdbf1b3b5263f81e843c6724b8bead7f1f
>>> Author: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>>> Date:   Fri Aug 16 07:59:15 2013 -0700
>>>
>>>     lzo: correctly bounds-check output buffer
>>>
>>>     This checks the size of the output buffer and fails if it was going
>>> to
>>>     overflow the buffer during lzo decompression.
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>>>     Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> This commit introduced the usage of the dst_len output parameter as
>>> additional input parameter containing the maximum output buffer size.
>>> This
>>> parameter isn't initialized in cmd_bootm.c:
>>>
>>>  454 #ifdef CONFIG_LZO
>>>  455     case IH_COMP_LZO: {
>>>  456         size_t size;
>>>  457
>>>  458         printf("   Uncompressing %s ... ", type_name);
>>>  459
>>>  460         ret = lzop_decompress(image_buf, image_len, load_buf,
>>> &size);
>>>
>>> Setting size to some big value (SZE_MAX is not avialable) fixed the
>>> behavior
>>> but I am unsure if this is the correct solution. I think its hard to get
>>> the
>>> max output buffer size at this point in cmd_bootm.c.
>>
>>
>> Does this work?
>
>
> Yes. Didn't saw that configuration option. Thanks.
>
>
>> ---
>> From: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>> Subject: [PATCH] bootm: set max output for LZO
>>
>> The LZO decompressor wasn't initializing the maximum output size.
>>
>> Reported-by: Matthias Weißer <weisserm at arcor.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   common/cmd_bootm.c |    2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
>> index 9751edc..c243a5b 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
>> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int bootm_load_os(bootm_headers_t *images,
>> unsigned long *load_end,
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_LZMA */
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_LZO
>>          case IH_COMP_LZO: {
>> -               size_t size;
>> +               size_t size = unc_len;
>>
>>                  printf("   Uncompressing %s ... ", type_name);
>>
>
> Tested-by: Matthias Weißer <weisserm at arcor.de>

Great! Thanks for testing.

Who can commit this patch? LZO is pretty busted at the moment without it. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security


More information about the U-Boot mailing list