[U-Boot] [U-Boot: RESEND][PATCH 0/7] Add support for Keystone2 SoC and K2HK EVM

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Mon Feb 10 20:58:10 CET 2014


Hi Murali,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:42:14 -0500, Murali Karicheri
<m-karicheri2 at ti.com> wrote:

> On 2/10/2014 1:01 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Murali,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:22:53 -0500, Murali Karicheri
> > <m-karicheri2 at ti.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/10/2014 3:32 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>> Hi Murali,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:23:07 -0500, Murali Karicheri
> >>> <m-karicheri2 at ti.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>    - Resending since I missed some in the CC
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch series add support for keystone2 SoC and K2HK EVM.
> >>>>
> >>>> Following patches were reviewed before in this list and v1 of the
> >>>> same is send with review comments incorporated:-
> >>>>     - tools: mkimage: add support for gpimage format
> >>>>     - arm: add support for arch timer
> >>>>     - NAND: DaVinci: allow forced disable of subpage writes
> >>>>
> >>>> The patch below is added as a seperate patch based on comments:-
> >>>>      - tools: sort the entries in Makefile
> >>>>
> >>>> Murali Karicheri (5):
> >>>>     tools: sort the entries in Makefile
> >>>>     tools: mkimage: add support for gpimage format
> >>> Is this image format required? Can't one of the existing image formats
> >>> be used?
> >> Alebert,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your response.
> >>
> >> We are actually re-using part of the OMAP image format by factoring out
> >> the common code
> >> and re-using.  So this is not a new format. Please review the code.
> > Thanks. This describes what you do and how you do it, but it does not
> > tell me why you are doing it and why you can't do otherwise. Let me
> > rephrase my question since you're mentioning branching off the OMAP
> > image format: why branch off? Why not simply use the existing OMAP image
> > format? Or another one?
> Because the ROM bootloader in our platform (keystone2) expect the header 
> to be in
> the following format :-
> 
> <size - 4 byte> <load addr- 4 byte> <data>
> 
> OMAP uses different format
> <omap header 512 bytes> <size - 4 byte> <load addr - 4 bytes>
> 
> gp header (size, loadaddr)  is common between the two image formats. So that
> is factored out and used in our platform. Hope this is clear now.

Ok, thanks.

> Regards,
> 
> Murali

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list