[U-Boot] [PATCH v6] spi: pl022_spi: Add support for ARM PL022 spi controller
Jagan Teki
jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Wed Jan 8 11:30:29 CET 2014
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Armando Visconti
<armando.visconti at st.com> wrote:
> Hello Jagan,
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
>
>
> On 12/20/2013 8:03 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Vipin,
>>>
>>> I have few quick comments, please fix it.
>>> Please use the u-boot-spi.git with master-probe branch for testing this
>>> driver.
>>> Let me know for any issues/concerns.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for v6 sent.
>>>>
>>>> Have you tested this?
>>>> on which board, include/configs/*.h file?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jagan.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Armando Visconti
>>>> <armando.visconti at st.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds the support for the ARM PL022 SPI controller for the
>>>>> standard
>>>>> variant (0x00041022), which has a 16bit wide and 8 locations deep TX/RX
>>>>> FIFO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti <armando.visconti at st.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar at st.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v5->v6
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Make use of spi_alloc_slave() macro.
>>>>> 2. Changed the identation on 'if statement' as requested
>>>>> by Jagan.
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c | 308
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 309 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile
>>>>> index d08609e..b6443b1 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_MXC_SPI) += mxc_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_MXS_SPI) += mxs_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_OC_TINY_SPI) += oc_tiny_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_OMAP3_SPI) += omap3_spi.o
>>>>> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_PL022_SPI) += pl022_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOFT_SPI) += soft_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_SH_SPI) += sh_spi.o
>>>>> COBJS-$(CONFIG_FSL_ESPI) += fsl_espi.o
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..5b47413
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/pl022_spi.c
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * (C) Copyright 2012
>>>>> + * Armando Visconti, ST Microelectronics, armando.visconti at st.com.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Driver for ARM PL022 SPI Controller. Based on atmel_spi.c
>>>>> + * by Atmel Corporation.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>>>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
>>>>> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>>>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
>>>>> + * MA 02111-1307 USA
>>>>> + */
>>>
>>> Use latest SPDX-License-Identifier:
>>> check for any existing one.
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#include <common.h>
>>>>> +#include <malloc.h>
>>>>> +#include <spi.h>
>>>>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>>>>> +#include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/* SSP registers mapping */
>>>>> +struct pl022 {
>>>
>>> Something like pl022_spi_regs
>>>
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cr0; /* 0x000 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cr1; /* 0x004 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_dr; /* 0x008 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_sr; /* 0x00c */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cpsr; /* 0x010 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_imsc; /* 0x014 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_ris; /* 0x018 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_mis; /* 0x01c */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_icr; /* 0x020 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_dmacr; /* 0x024 */
>>>>> + u8 reserved_1[0x080 - 0x028];
>>>>> + u32 ssp_itcr; /* 0x080 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_itip; /* 0x084 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_itop; /* 0x088 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_tdr; /* 0x08c */
>>>>> + u8 reserved_2[0xFE0 - 0x090];
>>>>> + u32 ssp_pid0; /* 0xfe0 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_pid1; /* 0xfe4 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_pid2; /* 0xfe8 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_pid3; /* 0xfec */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cid0; /* 0xff0 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cid1; /* 0xff4 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cid2; /* 0xff8 */
>>>>> + u32 ssp_cid3; /* 0xffc */
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>
>>> -- TAG+
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* SSP Control Register 0 - SSP_CR0 */
>>>>> +#define SSP_CR0_SPO (0x1 << 6)
>>>>> +#define SSP_CR0_SPH (0x1 << 7)
>>>>> +#define SSP_CR0_8BIT_MODE (0x07)
>>>>> +#define SSP_SCR_MAX (0xFF)
>>>>> +#define SSP_SCR_SHFT 8
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/* SSP Control Register 0 - SSP_CR1 */
>>>>> +#define SSP_CR1_MASK_SSE (0x1 << 1)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define SSP_CPSR_MAX (0xFE)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/* SSP Status Register - SSP_SR */
>>>>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_TFE (0x1 << 0) /* Transmit FIFO
>>>>> empty */
>>>>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_TNF (0x1 << 1) /* Transmit FIFO not
>>>>> full */
>>>>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_RNE (0x1 << 2) /* Receive FIFO not
>>>>> empty */
>>>>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_RFF (0x1 << 3) /* Receive FIFO full
>>>>> */
>>>>> +#define SSP_SR_MASK_BSY (0x1 << 4) /* Busy Flag */
>>>>> +
>>>
>>> --- TAG -
>>>
>>> Bit mask macros - please place after headers.
>>> We follow a simple format to write spi driver - please check
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/265683/
>>>
>>> And try to verify your code w.r.t above format - let me know any
>>> comments.
>>>
>>>>> +struct pl022_spi_slave {
>>>>> + struct spi_slave slave;
>>>>> + void *regs;
>>>
>>> Please use the structure pointer instead of void.
>>>
>>>>> + unsigned int freq;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static inline struct pl022_spi_slave *to_pl022_spi(struct spi_slave
>>>>> *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return container_of(slave, struct pl022_spi_slave, slave);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Following three functions should be provided by the
>>>>> + * board support package.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +int __weak spi_cs_is_valid(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void __weak spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + /* do nothing */
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void __weak spi_cs_deactivate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + /* do nothing */
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void spi_init(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + /* do nothing */
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * ARM PL022 exists in different 'flavors'.
>>>>> + * This drivers currently support the standard variant (0x00041022),
>>>>> that has a
>>>>> + * 16bit wide and 8 locations deep TX/RX FIFO.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static int pl022_is_supported(struct pl022_spi_slave *ps)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022 *pl022 = (struct pl022 *)ps->regs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* PL022 version is 0x00041022 */
>>>>> + if ((readl(&pl022->ssp_pid0) == 0x22) &&
>>>>> + (readl(&pl022->ssp_pid1) == 0x10) &&
>>>>> + ((readl(&pl022->ssp_pid2) & 0xf) == 0x04) &&
>>>>> + (readl(&pl022->ssp_pid3) == 0x00))
>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
>>>>> + unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022_spi_slave *ps;
>>>>> + struct pl022 *pl022;
>>>>> + u16 scr = 1, prescaler, cr0 = 0, cpsr = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!spi_cs_is_valid(bus, cs))
>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ps = spi_alloc_slave(struct pl022_spi_slave, bus, cs);
>>>>> + if (!ps)
>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ps->freq = max_hz;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + switch (bus) {
>>>>> + case 0:
>>>>> + ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE1
>>>>> + case 1:
>>>>> + ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE1;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE2
>>>>> + case 2:
>>>>> + ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE2;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE3
>>>>> + case 3:
>>>>> + ps->regs = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPI_BASE3;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + free(ps);
>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pl022 = (struct pl022 *)ps->regs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Check the PL022 version */
>>>>> + if (!pl022_is_supported(ps)) {
>>>>> + free(ps);
>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Set requested polarity and 8bit mode */
>>>>> + cr0 = SSP_CR0_8BIT_MODE;
>>>>> + cr0 |= (mode & SPI_CPHA) ? SSP_CR0_SPH : 0;
>>>>> + cr0 |= (mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SSP_CR0_SPO : 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + writel(cr0, &pl022->ssp_cr0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Program the SSPClk frequency */
>>>>> + prescaler = CONFIG_SYS_SPI_CLK / ps->freq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (prescaler <= 0xFF) {
>>>>> + cpsr = prescaler;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + for (scr = 1; scr <= SSP_SCR_MAX; scr++) {
>>>>> + if (!(prescaler % scr)) {
>>>>> + cpsr = prescaler / scr;
>>>>> + if (cpsr <= SSP_CPSR_MAX)
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (scr > SSP_SCR_MAX) {
>>>>> + scr = SSP_SCR_MAX;
>>>>> + cpsr = prescaler / scr;
>>>>> + cpsr &= SSP_CPSR_MAX;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (cpsr & 0x1)
>>>>> + cpsr++;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + writel(cpsr, &pl022->ssp_cpsr);
>>>>> + cr0 = readl(&pl022->ssp_cr0);
>>>>> + writel(cr0 | (scr - 1) << SSP_SCR_SHFT, &pl022->ssp_cr0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return &ps->slave;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void spi_free_slave(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + free(ps);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>>>>> + struct pl022 *pl022 = (struct pl022 *)ps->regs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Enable the SPI hardware */
>>>>> + setbits_le32(&pl022->ssp_cr1, SSP_CR1_MASK_SSE);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>>>>> + struct pl022 *pl022 = (struct pl022 *)ps->regs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Disable the SPI hardware */
>>>>> + writel(0x0, &pl022->ssp_cr1);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,
>>>>> + const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct pl022_spi_slave *ps = to_pl022_spi(slave);
>>>>> + struct pl022 *pl022 = (struct pl022 *)ps->regs;
>>>>> + u32 len_tx = 0, len_rx = 0, len;
>>>>> + u32 ret = 0;
>>>>> + const u8 *txp = dout;
>>>>> + u8 *rxp = din, value;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (bitlen == 0)
>>>>> + /* Finish any previously submitted transfers */
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * TODO: The controller can do non-multiple-of-8 bit
>>>>> + * transfers, but this driver currently doesn't support it.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * It's also not clear how such transfers are supposed to be
>>>>> + * represented as a stream of bytes...this is a limitation of
>>>>> + * the current SPI interface.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (bitlen % 8) {
>>>>> + ret = -1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Errors always terminate an ongoing transfer */
>>>>> + flags |= SPI_XFER_END;
>>>>> + goto out;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + len = bitlen / 8;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (flags & SPI_XFER_BEGIN)
>>>>> + spi_cs_activate(slave);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + while (len_tx < len) {
>>>>> + if (readl(&pl022->ssp_sr) & SSP_SR_MASK_TNF) {
>>>>> + value = (txp != NULL) ? *txp++ : 0;
>>>>> + writel(value, &pl022->ssp_dr);
>>>>> + len_tx++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (readl(&pl022->ssp_sr) & SSP_SR_MASK_RNE) {
>>>>> + value = readl(&pl022->ssp_dr);
>>>>> + if (rxp)
>>>>> + *rxp++ = value;
>>>>> + len_rx++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + while (len_rx < len_tx) {
>>>>> + if (readl(&pl022->ssp_sr) & SSP_SR_MASK_RNE) {
>>>>> + value = readl(&pl022->ssp_dr);
>>>>> + if (rxp)
>>>>> + *rxp++ = value;
>>>>> + len_rx++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +out:
>>>>> + if (flags & SPI_XFER_END)
>>>>> + spi_cs_deactivate(slave);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.11.7
>>
>> Ping
>>
>
> Unfortunately lot of changes happened to our organization
> and we (myself and Vipin) are no longer able to proceed in doing
> this job.
>
> So I think we need to drop this patch, unless someone from the
> u-boot community has the possibility to (and is willing to) proceed
> in implementing and testing the proper changes.
Thanks,
--
Jagan.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list