[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH 0/7] TI: OMAP3: Use common config file.

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Fri Jan 24 14:37:14 CET 2014


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:45:36AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> 2014/1/6 Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:11:25PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >> 2013/12/6 Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo at gmail.com>:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Most of the boards based on TI processors uses common configuration files
> >> > (ti_armv7_common.h, ti_<processor>_common.h) to avoid duplication of code.
> >> > This is right except for OMAP3-based boards. In order to use the same schema
> >> > as used on am33xx, omap4, omap5 and dra7 TI processors these patches create
> >> > a new ti_omap3_common.h (that include ti_armv7_common.h) with the purpose that
> >> > all OMAP3 board can use it.
> >> >
> >> > Patches 1 and 2 just renames current omap4|omap5_common.h to
> >> > ti_omap4|omap5_common.h to be coherent with current ti_am33xx_common.h,
> >> > ti_armv7_common.h and the new ti_omap3_common.h. It's just a cosmetic change so
> >> > if people don't like it I don't have any inconvenient to remove from these
> >> > series.
> >> >
> >> > Patches 3 and 4 modifies the ti_armv7_common.h to be more compatible with OMAP3
> >> > boards. For example, patch 3 removes the assumption that all ti_armv7 have an
> >> > ELM hardware engine and patch 4 handles the case that the number of DRAM banks
> >> > is defined at board level. The patch 5 is also required to integrate the use
> >> > of ti_armv7_common.h on OMAP3 boards.
> >> >
> >> > Patch 6 creates the new ti_omap3_common.h to be used for any OMAP3-based board.
> >> >
> >> > And finally, patch 7 moves the IGEP boards to use the new common file. As I
> >> > only have IGEP hardware to test these patches I decided only implement the use
> >> > case for these boards. I don't have any inconvenient to move other OMAP3 boards
> >> > to use this schema but I prefer leave the decision to the board maintainers.
> >> >
> >> > Any comments, improvements, fixes are welcome.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> > Enric Balletbo i Serra (7):
> >> >   ARM: OMAP4: Rename to ti_omap4_common.h
> >> >   ARM: OMAP5: Rename to ti_omap5_common.h
> >> >   TI: armv7: Move ELM support to SoC configuration file.
> >> >   TI: armv7: Do not define the number DRAM banks if is already defined.
> >> >   ARM: OMAP3: Rename OMAP3_PUBLIC_SRAM_* to NON_SECURE_SRAM_*
> >> >   TI: OMAP3: Create common config files for TI OMAP3 platforms.
> >> >   OMAP3: igep00x0: Convert to ti_omap3_common.h.
> >> >
> >> >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap3.h            |   6 +-
> >> >  include/configs/dra7xx_evm.h                       |   4 +-
> >> >  include/configs/omap3_igep00x0.h                   | 190 +--------------------
> >> >  include/configs/omap4_panda.h                      |   4 +-
> >> >  include/configs/omap4_sdp4430.h                    |   4 +-
> >> >  include/configs/omap5_uevm.h                       |   4 +-
> >> >  include/configs/ti_am335x_common.h                 |   4 +
> >> >  include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h                  |  11 +-
> >> >  include/configs/ti_omap3_common.h                  |  73 ++++++++
> >> >  .../configs/{omap4_common.h => ti_omap4_common.h}  |  10 +-
> >> >  .../configs/{omap5_common.h => ti_omap5_common.h}  |  10 +-
> >> >  11 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
> >> >  create mode 100644 include/configs/ti_omap3_common.h
> >> >  rename include/configs/{omap4_common.h => ti_omap4_common.h} (95%)
> >> >  rename include/configs/{omap5_common.h => ti_omap5_common.h} (95%)
> >>
> >> Ping, any comment on this patch series ?
> >
> > I intend to pick this up after v2014.01.  Thanks!
> >
> 
> Now that merge window is open, did you try to pick these patches?

I'm planning to today.

> There is an issue that affect the IGEP boards introduced by commit
> 
>   commit f33b9bd3984fb11e1d8566a866adc5957b1e1c9d
>   arm: omap3: Enable clocks for peripherals only if they are used
> 
> To fix the issue, I need to modify the omap3_igep00x0.h file and I'm
> thinking that it's preferable wait and send the patch after these
> patches.
> 
> Also there is any plan to create a branch for 2014.01 with fixes ?

Depends on how many other boards also need to re-enable some clocks I
guess.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140124/6bd217ce/attachment.pgp>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list