[U-Boot] [PATCH] Ethernet: let user know if there is no valid ethernet address

Pavel Machek pavel at denx.de
Fri Jul 11 12:43:47 CEST 2014


On Fri 2014-07-11 11:46:56, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, July 11, 2014 at 11:42:13 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > When there's no ethernet address available, u-boot currently prints
> > "could not set ethernet address", but fails to mention that there's no
> > address it could set. Make it a bit less confusing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at denx.de>
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/eth.c b/net/eth.c
> > index 99386e3..b72ae84 100644
> > --- a/net/eth.c
> > +++ b/net/eth.c
> > @@ -179,10 +179,12 @@ int eth_write_hwaddr(struct eth_device *dev, const
> > char *base_name, dev->name);
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	if (dev->write_hwaddr &&
> > -			!eth_mac_skip(eth_number)) {
> > -		if (!is_valid_ether_addr(dev->enetaddr))
> > +	if (dev->write_hwaddr && !eth_mac_skip(eth_number)) {
> > +		if (!is_valid_ether_addr(dev->enetaddr)) {
> > +			printf("\nError: %s ethernet address not valid: %pM\n",
> > +				 dev->name, dev->enetaddr);
> >  			return -1;
> 
> You might as well return -EINVAL here while at it.

And change two things at once? Too scary :-).

> btw. I think I should really NAK you a patch or two, just so you can continue 
> complaining to me about how noone likes you here ;-)

I'm not saying noone likes me. Everybody loves me, especially my horse
when I bring carrots. Thanks for the reviews. But I still did not get
any "applied" or "looks good, will apply" responses...

Best regards,

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


More information about the U-Boot mailing list