[U-Boot] [PATCH] Ethernet: let user know if there is no valid ethernet address

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Fri Jul 11 23:24:57 CEST 2014


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:30:07PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-07-11 21:13:22, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Pavel,
> > 
> > In message <20140711163247.GA14873 at amd.pavel.ucw.cz> you wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, but this is not really helpful.  "Not set" and "not valid" are
> > > > different things.  "Not valid" might be confusing when none is set at
> > > > all.
> > > 
> > > Well, it is what the code checks for.
> > > 
> > > > Also, if I understand correctly, we will now have _two_ error messages
> > > > ("ethernet address not valid" followed by "could not set ethernet
> > > > address")?  That's not so nice either.
> > > 
> > > Ok, would it be acceptable to change 'count not set' message to 'could
> > > not set or invalid address' and print the address as well?
> > 
> > Print the address - if it is not set?  I think we should provide useful
> > error messages.  Either the address has not been set, then we should
> > say so, or it is invalid, then we should say that.
> 
> Well, it may be unset (00:00:...) or it may be invalid (b2:a3:...).
> 
> I think I do not understand you correctly. Yes, we should provide
> useful error messages, and current one is untrue and confusing.
> 
> Can you suggest a patch or messages you'd like to see?

Yes, say "unset" when it is unset and "invalid" when set but not valid.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140711/a469f261/attachment.pgp>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list